"Consumers simply have no way of knowing what their Rhino product will actually do to them,'' the suit states. Rhino products have undisclosed and unapproved ingredients that carry extreme side effects, the suit alleges. The Sapps bought Rhino 50K pills on the website for about $15, relying on statements made on the website that the pills were "natural,'' were a "supplement'' and did not need a doctor's prescription, the suit states.Ī should have disclosed on the website and on the product packaging that Rhino 50K contained or was likely to contain prescription drugs, that many other Rhino products had been flagged by the Food and Drug Administration for containing undisclosed prescription drugs and that Amazon had doubts as to the purity and safety of all Rhino products in general, the suit alleges. Sapp's wife, 38-year-old Renae Sapp, is suing for loss of consortium. Others include strict products liability, negligence and failure to warn. Los Angeles Superior Court Judge David Cowan ruled that Jeffery Sapp of Upland had provided enough facts for now to support those claims, which are among 10 causes of action filed in the complaint originally brought in February 2019 against Amazon. A 37-year-old man who alleges he suffered cardiac arrest and brain damage after taking male enhancement pills he bought through can move forward with his allegations of fraud, negligent misrepresentation and unfair business practices, a judge ruled Tuesday.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |